Posts

9-28-18: Are there any Propositions on the November ballot that are real estate related?

/in /by

Question of the week:  Are there any Propositions on the November ballot that are real estate related?

 

 Answer:  With the election just over month away, and your absentee ballot available in ten days, and the onslaught of television ads just starting, now is a good time to review some of the propositions on your ballot.

 

A brief bio break before I get into the ballot measures. I have a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Political Studies from Pitzer College (1984) and have continued to be a student of both disciplines. My philosophy is that economics is the foundation of most personal, organizational and political decisions—if you cannot afford it you cannot do it, and if  you do the long-term consequences will generally not be positive. With that out of the way let’s look at the real estate related propositions on your November ballot.

 

There are four ballot measures that in some way involve real estate in California, Props 1, 2, 5 and 10. Here is a brief description of each and my position (if you are so inclined to care).

 

Proposition 1: Affordable Housing Bond If passed this measure authorizes the state to borrow $4 billion in bonds for affordable housing. The funds would be broken into different areas of expenditure with the largest amount being for the building and renovating of rental units. Other funds would be used to provide home loan assistance to Veterans, housing construction in densely populated areas, down payment assistance programs for low and moderate income potential homebuyers and housing development for agricultural workers.

 

Understanding that more affordable housing is needed in the state I do not feel adding $4 billion in bond payments to our budget and cycling the money through state and local bureaucracies is the way to provide more affordable housing. Supply and demand create prices, some of these funds are targeted in a manner to increase demand, which increases prices, and other funds are targeted to rather ambiguous objectives that appear to expand the power of the government in the market place. I feel that local ordinances and applying tax benefits to developers and property owners would be a more efficient way to create more affordable housing. Dumping government funds into a market has never been shown as a way to lower market prices. I will be voting No on Prop 1. I expect this measure to pass given the lack of a unified opposition and the funds coming into the “Yes” side of the ballot.

 

Proposition 2: Mental Health Housing If passed this measure authorizes the state to re-allocate funds currently directed to county mental health services across the state to fund supportive housing for those suffering mental illness. With a directive and the funding the state can make strides in providing long-term solutions to mental illness sufferers and provide blueprint for counties to help with their homeless problems. Across levels of government funds have been allocated for the homeless with no impact on the problem—it seems to be getting worse. By creating housing for the mentally ill that includes on site social services and medical services this proposition is the best solution I have seen proposed so far at any level to start to make a dent in the issue. I will be voting Yes on Prop 2. I expect this measure to pass given its purpose and how much the issue has been one of top concern to most of the state’s residents.

 

Proposition 5: Residential Property Tax Portability If passed this measure would expand the current property tax transfer rules of Props 60 and 90. Under current rules if homeowner over 55 sells their current residence and purchases a new residence of lower value the homeowner can transfer their current tax base to their new home. The portability of the current tax base is limited as only a few counties in the state allow those otherwise eligible to transfer their current tax base into their county (i.e. homeowner selling Orange County could not transfer tax to new home in Shasta County). As well the current laws allow only a one-time transfer.

 

If Prop 5 is passed the one-time transfer limit is eliminated and the purchase price of your new home does not eliminate your ability to transfer your tax base to lower your taxes if your new home costs more than the home you sold—your tax base will go up but not to market value. As well if you purchase a home for lower value than the home you sold your tax base will be lower than your current tax base. Here are two examples to hopefully clarify how the measure will work if passed.

 

Buying more expensive home:  A couple that qualifies for the property tax transfer owns a home in Los Angeles County they purchased many years ago for $110,000. Today the taxable value is $200,000 and their base tax is $2200 per year ($200,000 x 1.1% state property tax rate). They sell their home for $600,000 and purchase a new home in San Luis Obispo County for $700,000. Their new property tax base is calculated by subtracting the sales price from their prior home from the sales price of the new home and adding the result to the tax base from their prior home:

 

New home price minus prior home sales price: $700,000 – $600,000 = $100,000

Price differential plus prior home tax base: $100,000 + $200,000 = $300,000

 

The new tax base is $300,000, for annual property tax base of $3300 ($300,000 x 1.1%). Without Prop 5 the tax base would be $7700 per year (market value $700,000 x 1.1%), the homeowners are saving $4400 per year.

 

Buying less expensive home: This gets a little more complicated as the new tax base is reduced by a percentage based on the difference between the old property value and the new property value. Same couple sells same home for $600,000 with $200,000 tax base. They purchase a new home in San Luis Obispo County for $450,000.

 

New home price divided by prior home sales price: $450,000 ÷ $600,000 = 75%

Old tax base times price differential percentage: $200,000 x 75% = $150,000

 

The new tax base is $150,000 for annual taxes of $1650 per year, a savings of $550 per year over what they are currently paying.

 

I think the best tax law in America is California’s Prop 13. We pay some of the highest income and sales taxes in the country, but homeowners have the best property tax protection from the state of any state in the country. Prop 5 makes the Prop 13 even more generous to homeowners over the age of 55. Because of the over-generosity of Prop 5 I will vote No. If Prop 5 were to mirror Prop 60 and only eliminate the inability to transfer tax bases over any county lines in the state and enable more than one transfer, particularly in cases of divorce or spouse who have passed away, I would vote for Prop 5. As it is written with homeowners purchasing a new home and being able to lower their tax base to me is not equitable to the counties, state or other tax payers and is not needed. And most importantly, if Prop 5 does pass I see it as a strong rallying issue for those who want to eliminate Prop 13 or severely alter it so that higher property taxes result in the future. I expect this measure to fail.

 

Word has it that the California Association of Realtors is already working on a revision to Prop 5 for the 2020 ballot should the measure fail this year. I hope they do as I would like to see the current Prop 60 benefits available to be transferred across county lines. Were I to be asked to craft a revised proposition I would make the changes I suggest changing the calculation on purchase a new home for a higher price to increase the tax base from formula in Prop 5, eliminate ability to lower tax base by purchasing a new lower priced home, eliminated unlimited ability to transfer the tax base but enable additional transfers due to divorce and/or spousal death, and finally I would raise the age of eligibility to 60 from 55.

 

 

Proposition 10: Local Rent Control Initiative If passed this measure will roll back a 1995 law that limited the use of rent control in California (Costa-Hawkins) and enable greater ability for local government to pass, and/or expand, rent control in their jurisdictions. Costa-Hawkins disallowed cities from enacting rent control on properties first occupied in 1995 and single family dwellings (including condos and townhomes). If passed Prop 10 would enable rent control on all rental units, including single family dwellings—and room rentals inside a single family dwelling.

 

Any rent control imposed by government on landlords benefits a very narrow group of residents: those already renting. Wherever rent control has been enacted rental prices are higher than similar geographically nearby markets. Rental units are scarce in rent control communities as tenants do not move to preserve their low housing cost. Because of the scarcity of available units with a rent control unit does come on the market the landlord is able to get premium rent for the unit since there is little competition. Over time as each generation of rent controlled tenants vacate units the rents in the market climb disproportionate to the surrounding markets.

 

According to a spokesman from the California Business Roundtable there are currently 12,000 rental units across the state approved for construction. Every project is on hold until after the November election. Should Prop 10 pass the projects will not start building as the investors/builders do not want their investments to be restricted from market returns by local governments enacting rent control. I will vote No on Prop 10. I expect this measure to fail.

 

There have been many great benefits to Californians as a result of the ballot initiative process, ad many great detriments as well. It is our duty to study the issues, and candidates, presented and understand both sides before casting our ballots. I hope the above comments on the propositions involving real estate provide you with a decent perspective and spur you on to study these and the other propositions more thoroughly.

 

 

Have a question? Ask me!

 

A busy week for mortgage rate impacting news. First, and most expected, the Fed increased it Fed Funds Rate by 0.25%, as expected. The immediate result was the prime rate, and therefore rates on Home Equity Lines of Credit, also increase 0.25%. Prime rate is now at 5.25%, up one percent from one year ago. The Fed announcement also indicated it is sticking to schedule of one more increase in rates this year and three next year. The news is mortgage rate neutral since the rate increase was expected and the Fed did not announce they anticipate more increases than previously announced.

 

Second quarter Gross Domestic Product went through its third and final evaluation and there was no revision made to the prior revision putting the growth for the quarter at 4.2% annualized. With no change to the growth number there was no impact on mortgages.

 

Last Friday of the month gives us important data on consumers as personal income, consumer consumption and inflation data are released. Good news on all fronts for mortgage rates as personal income matched last month’s increase of 0.3% and the core inflation rate dropped from 0.4% in August to flat this month—meaning those higher wages will go further. Consumer increased spending by 0.3%, lower growth than previous months but still the sixth month in a row of positive spending growth and the eleventh of the past twelve months and 3.8% overall gain in spending from last year. Overall the news should be somewhat negative for rates as it shows economic strength is continuing and should continue through the third and fourth quarters absent some catastrophic event.

 

 

Rates for Friday September 28, 2018: Intra-week rates had a bounce up and then down and the result is the conforming rate is flat from last Friday and the high-balance rate is down slightly for the week. Many analysists are hinting at a possible decline, very small decline, in rates in the next week or so; however, this analysist is not convinced of the underlying factors that would make a such a prediction a strong one.

 

FIXED RATE MORTGAGES AT COST OF 1.25 POINTS LOCKED FOR 45 DAYS:

30 year conforming                                            4.625%    Flat

30 year high-balance conforming                      4.75%     Down 0.125%

 

Please note that these are base rates and adjustments may be added for condominiums, refinances, credit scores, loan to value, no impound account and period rate is locked. Rates are based on 20% down with 740 FICO score for purchase mortgages.

 

 

I have a pretty strong background in politics and economics, which perhaps comes through in my WR&MU. My mom grew up in a very politically connected household in Sacramento. Her father was an attorney and lobbyist and her mother was socially active in political circles. My mother continued the family behavior. When my sister, brother and I were growing up we did so with campaign pins and bumper stickers, meet-and-greets with candidates and seeing our mom very briefly on the television from the 1968 Republican National Convention in Miami.

 

Growing up my goal was to become and attorney like my grandfather and both uncles and I majored in economics and political studies in college. My study habits my last few semesters were not great so I put law school on hold to get some discipline. I started earning money, found the mortgage industry and law school was permanently in the rearview mirror. However, my interest in the two disciplines that comprised my major has never left me and I continue to study and read history, economics and political books, articles and journals. For those wondering, the basis of my personal philosophy is that economics is the overwhelming factor that influences politics and therefore history, be it within a family (microeconomics) or nation (macroeconomics). As I often say, take care of the economics and most other issues sort themselves out.

 

Whatever your interest I hope you are able to spend personal time daily, weekly, monthly to indulge in your interest and continue to expand your scope of knowledge and understanding.

 

Have a great week,

 

Dennis

8-31-18: Should we buy a rental property?

/in /by

Question of the week:  Should we buy a rental property?

 

 Answer:  This is a common question for those of us in the real estate industries, as well as for professionals in other industries such as family attorneys, accountants and financial advisors. Looking to secure a long term investment many families would like to purchase a property to rent out for investment income and long term value appreciation.

 

Is it right for you?

 

As you can imagine, there are several factors to consider before deciding to purchase rental property. Here are some that come to mind, but certainly not a complete list.

 

The first question you must answer is, what are my expectations? Do you want positive monthly cash flow? Are you most concerned about long term appreciation and growth of your initial investment? Do you want a loss on your tax returns to off-set income? Each of these factors can be obtained, but each also has different requirements for how you purchase the property.

 

Positive cash flow can be very challenging in the California, especially if you are in a county that touches the Pacific Ocean. Cash flow is determined by what income the property will generate from rents minus the expenses of ownership: mortgage, taxes, insurance, maintenance and vacancy. Because real estate prices have grown it takes substantial down payment to achieve positive cash flow in most properties. For instance, if you are looking at purchasing a $500,000 home as a rental in an area where the market rents for the property are around $2500 can you achieve positive cash flow? The minimum down for a single family residence non-owner occupied loan is 20%, and today the rate is about 5.125% with that down payment. The monthly PITI is almost $2800—your cash flow is not positive. Putting 25% down the rate drops to 4.875% and your PITI drops to $2500 so you are cash flow neutral before maintenance and upkeep. Before closing costs you have invested $125,000 for neutral cash flow.

 

That said, if the property increases in value an average of 3% for the next five years your property has increased in value about $80,000 so on paper you have seen your initial down payment increase about 65%, from $500,000 to about $580,000. As well you have likely had depreciation on your taxes, that provided you with a loss on your tax returns for the property (if you are eligible to claim real estate losses) which has saved you tens of thousands of dollars in income taxes. So your monthly cash flow is neutral, perhaps slightly negative, but you have seen your investment grow in value and gained cash flow with your tax deductions.

 

Keep in mind the above scenario is based on finding a home for $500,000 in an area that rents for $2500 per month and would increase in value an average of 3% per year over five years. That said it appears this type of scenario checks the boxes for cash flow (after taxes), appreciation and deductions on your tax returns.

 

What are other factors to consider? Costs is a very important consideration. It costs money to purchase real estate, the rule of thumb is about 3% of the purchase price, and it costs money to sell real estate, the rule of thumb is about 8% depending on real estate commissions. So in the above scenario you have about $15,000 on top of your down payment to close the transaction and if you sell at the end of the five years your costs of sale are about $46,000. For your total investment of $140,000 your next gain in equity from the market is about $34,000 which is a  nice 24% return over the five years.

 

Keep in mind that $34,000 will be taxed as capital gains and any depreciation you claimed will be “recaptured”, a fancy term for taxed. Check with your tax preparer but depending on your income the taxes could exceed $10,000.

 

You can avoid the taxes by participating in an IRS tax deferred 1031 exchange, which entails selling the property and having the proceeds transferred to an escrow to purchase another property. You avoid the taxes, but you are not benefiting from the capital appreciation as it has to roll over into another property.

 

One mistake many first time investors, and some experienced, make with investment property is they care too much. Too often they want to purchase property they would want live in, or spend too much money on the property. I have seen clients spend tens of thousands of dollars to upgrade kitchens, bathrooms, floorings, etc, to be of the type and quality they would want, but for tenants who generally do not treat their homes the way they would if they owned it. If you want to get in the real estate rental market as a landlord you must remember that it is a business, you are buying an investment not a home and as such your objective is to provide a clean, safe property for rent. Putting in granite counter tops and solid oak cabinets will not increase the rents you can collect, perhaps it puts you at or near the top of the market for the area you are in, but if the market is $2500 you won’t be able to rent for $3000 just because of the nice kitchen.

 

Which brings me to the most popular way most families obtain their first piece of rental property: convert your existing home to a rental when you purchase your next home. This has many advantages. First, you save on closing costs. Second, you do not need a cash investment for the purchase of the property—though you will need one for the purchase of your new home. Third, the loan is already in place and likely at a lower rate than the current market for non-owner-occupied financing. Fourth, if you sell the property within three years of converting it to a rental you probably can avoid capital gains tax should the property appreciate.

 

Should you purchase a property for rental income and investment? The answer requires a lot of thought and research as to the short and long-term consequences. Before you make the decision consult with your tax preparer and investigate other options with the money you would be investing.  Compare possible rates of return in cash flow and appreciation, costs of acquisition and divestment, on-going costs of maintenance and loss of income, and the potential tax liabilities.

 

I am happy to be part of your investigation by running numbers and scenarios for different sales prices, down payments and types of properties if you are considering purchasing rental property.

 

Have a question? Ask me!

 

Lots of major economic news this week. On Tuesday the Conference Board reported that consumer confidence is at its highest level since October 2000. The higher confidence is supported by increases in personal spending and earnings in July. Spending increased 0.4%, the fifth month in a row for the primary economic engine for the country. The increase in spending was greater than the increase in personal incomes, which rose 0.3% in July, causing a slight downtick in the savings rate. The higher earnings, increased spending and tighter labor market caused prices measured by the PCE index to increase 2.3% in July, the highest level in six years. More importantly the index used by the Federal Reserve to gauge inflation, the PCE price index stripped of energy and food to reach 2.0%. The different pieces of data are each supportive of higher interest rates and collectively provide a strong push for higher rates.

 

Also putting upward pressure on rates, was the revision of 2nd quarter Gross Domestic Product released this week showing growth of 4.2%, revised upward from the initial report of 4.1%. A combination of tax cuts and consumer spending pushed corporate profits higher for the quarter helping push GDP growth.

 

Rates for Friday August 31, 2018: My economic training and experience is telling me that rates should have gone up this week based on the data. They are flat from last Friday, and have remained flat since the first Friday in August. Investors are tempering their decisions on bonds and mortgages waiting to see if a big shoe drops from the White House on tariffs with China and other nations. Earlier this week there was an apparent understanding with Mexico to revise our trade agreements, perhaps the same can occur with Canada, which would alter NAFTA. We will see how those negotiations and others go. If the result is positive in regards to no tariff wars and updated agreements we will definitely see rates go up–absent some other major issue or crisis.

 

FIXED RATE MORTGAGES AT COST OF 1.25 POINTS LOCKED FOR 45 DAYS:

30 year conforming                                            4.375%            Flat

30 year high-balance conforming                      4.50%               Flat

 

Please note that these are base rates and adjustments may be added for condominiums, refinances, credit scores, loan to value, no impound account and period rate is locked. Rates are based on 20% down with 740 FICO score for purchase mortgages.

 

 

To slightly change the famous Alice Cooper song, Schools In ‘Til Summer. Our Long Beach Poly junior was a bit grumpy in the early hours of Wednesday morning seeing the wrong side of seven o’clock for the first time in months, I’m sure she was the only teenager or younger in the city in that frame of mind.

 

Hoping all your students have a successful year!

 

Have a great weekend,

 

Dennis

7-20-18: What is the process for our mortgage application when we purchase a home?

/in /by

Question of the week:  What is the process for our mortgage application when we purchase a home?

 

Answer:  Mortgage application packages are very deadline oriented. For a purchase this is because we have a closing date that is agreed upon by the buyer and seller, for a refinance the deadline is when the rate lock expires.

 

Here is a not so detailed look at the timeline on a purchase, much of it is the same as with a refinance.

 

Ideally the first step in your mortgage process when purchasing a home is we have detailed conversations and review your records to determine your ability to qualify for a mortgage to purchase at a certain price with a certain amount down. This is the pre-qualification, or pre-approval, stage. We review your income by looking at paystubs and tax documents. We obtain a credit report to see you credit score and confirm your balances and payments on outstanding credit. We look at your asset statements so we know how much we have in funds for down payment, closing costs and reserves if necessary. And we discuss your objective, long term plans and other factors that may influence the amount and type of mortgage that would be ideal for you and your family. This step can take an hour or several days depending on the complexity of your finances or issues we need to address. Next step: Look at houses and write offers.

 

You have your offer accepted and we begin the formal application process. At this stage we complete any information for the loan application so you can sign the application and disclosures. We collect necessary documents supporting income, credit, obligations, funds being used for closing and other items we discuss as necessary. Once we have the signed application and necessary items we lock in your loan rate for a specified period of time that matches your escrow time frame but in 15 day increments (i.e. lock for 30 or 45 days). As well, we communicate with both your agent and the seller’s agent to establish clear lines of communication, confirm who will be the person for the appraiser to contact to set up inspection of the property. We also initiate contact with the escrow officer to make sure s/he and our staff have each other’s contact information as they will be sending a lot of information and documents back and forth. Finally in this stage, we order the appraisal. This stage is generally one to two days depending on how quickly you get the required items to us. Next step: Processing.

 

During the processing period our staff is collecting the necessary information to ensure underwriting will approve your loan as applied for. All your information will be reviewed and verified. During the review our staff will ask questions that may need additional information to support answers: what is this large deposit, there are some statements in the tax return that indicate another business or sources of income to verify. At this time they are also collecting necessary documents for the approval. The appraisal report will be completed and reviewed. We will obtain a copy of the preliminary title report on the property. Escrow will send us the escrow instructions which detail the agreement between you and the seller. We will communicate with your insurance company to ensure there will be sufficient coverage of the property to protect the lender should there be fire or other major damage. Any loose ends or issues that may arise as all this information is collected and reviewed are addressed and the necessary parties are contacted and additional information requested to cover the issue so underwriting will approve the file. The timing for this stage depends on the how quickly others respond to our request for items. If the listing agent puts off the appraisal inspection for a week or ten days that slows us down. If we request additional statements on an account, tax returns on a business entity, source of funds, this can slow us down if the information is not forthcoming. If everything is into us in a very timely manner this step should be about 10 business days. Next step: Underwriting.

 

The mortgage application package, at this point several inches thick (our record is over 1 foot high with clients who had multiple companies and properties resulting in about ten tax returns for various entities). All the documentation, disclosures, reports are then sent to the underwriting department. Once received it is assigned to an underwriter who reviews the file and issues an approval, usually “conditional” approval as the underwriter generally asks for items to complete the file, an updated paystub, a letter of explanation for some issue, clarification on the appraisal, support for continuing income from commissions, overtime or bonus, a myriad of items may come up. The underwriting period is generally two to three business days. Depending on the additional conditions requested the time frame from initial approval to final approval can be as short as 3 to 4 days or considerably longer depending on conditions requested and ability to provide them. Next step: Loan Docs.

 

Once we get the approval and are moving into the final stages of the transaction we will issue to you the Closing Disclosure (or CD). We usually like to issue this via DocuSign as when you acknowledge the CD will start a timer on when you can sign loan documents, which is three days not counting Sundays and holidays. So if we issue the CD on Friday and you open the link and “sign” on Sunday you cannot sign loan documents until Wednesday, if you had signed on Friday you could sign docs on Tuesday. Does one day make a difference? Next step: Funding.

 

The loan documents will be sent to escrow and available for you to sign the day you are eligible to sign after the CD rescission period is up. Escrow will contact you to set up a time to sign in their office, or if more convenient set up a mobile notary. At this time we will know the amount of funds needed to complete the closing of the transaction. Escrow does not take personal checks, the funds for closing need to be either via a cashier’s check or a wire (see important note below). After you sign loan docs and your funds are in escrow we fund the loan. If we have the loan docs in our office in the morning and all is in order we can fund the day we get the loan docs, the time from doc signing to funding can be as short as one day. Next step: Closing.

 

Closing occurs when the deeds are recorded by the title company at the county recorder where the property is located. The grant deed conveying title from the seller to you is recorded first, then the trust deed securing the property as collateral for the mortgage is recorded. Depending on what county you live in recording happens either the same day (Orange County is a same day recording county), or it occurs the next day (Los Angeles County will not allow funding and recording on the same day). This is where that one day difference on the CD can impact closing. Since we cannot fund and record on the same day in some counties we very rarely fund a loan in those counties on a Friday for many reasons, for one you are paying interest for two additional days on a property you do not own. Second, if something happens to the property, or the current owner, we have two loans on the property and two insurance policies (your policy must be in effect before we can fund). As you can imagine this creates several issues that need to be unwound. While something could happen to the property between funding on Wednesday and recording on Thursday, it is less likely than something happening between funding Friday and recording Monday. So the closing step is either same day or next day. Next step: Move In!

 

NOTE, VERY IMPORTANT! There has been a wire fraud scheme occurring with real estate closings. The scam works like this. You are in escrow to purchase a property and you receive an email from what looks like your escrow officer. It is instructing you to wire your funds for closing and provides the necessary information. The email has the escrow company’s email address, signature on the email looks the same and by all accounts is from the escrow company. This email will come near closing but before funds are usually asked for from escrow. What has occurred is that at some point your email was hacked, it could have been last month or last year or even longer ago. The hackers run your emails through their filters which are set to look for keywords in your emails, such as “escrow,” “mortgage,” “purchase home,” etc. When any keyword occurs the account is monitored to determine is you are engaging in a real estate transaction. The next step is to determine who is who in the communications and then spoof the email account for the closing agent, i.e. escrow, and send you the email requesting you wire the funds into the scammers account. Do not reply to the email, do not send the funds to the account listed in the email and do not call the number listed in the email as chances are it is not the escrow company you are using. Before sending funds call the escrow officer from the number printed on the escrow instructions you have, or by getting the number from us or your agent, and verify the amount of funds required and ask them to send you an email with the wire instructions, then call back to verify the information is correct.

 

As you can see the time frame for closing an escrow on a purchase can be 30 days or a little less, or longer depending on everyone having the information needed and requested and providing it in a very timely fashion. Closing times are dependent on many actors all performing together and when needed.

 

Have a question? Ask me!

 

Consumers appear to be happy. Retail sales for June were reported on Monday and showed a 0.5% increase from the prior month. This is good news, what was pretty incredible news was that May retail sales were revised upward 0.5% for a total increase of 1.3% from April, that is a very rare number to reach. Auto sales had strong months in May and June, up almost 1% each month, and restaurants also showed strong increases, up 1.5% in May and 2.6% in June. This news indicates consumers willing to increase their discretionary spending, what’s more discretionary than eating out instead of at home? The news is somewhat negative for rates as higher consumer spending supports stronger economic growth, which leads to higher interest rates.

 

Historic is the word to describe yesterday’s jobless claims report. Last week 207,000 initial jobless claims were filed, the lowest weekly amount since December 1969. Continuing jobless claims, as sign of length of unemployment, are at 1.738 million which is at a level last seen in the early 1970s. The news is interest rate unfriendly as a tight labor market can, should, lead to some wage inflation which will lead to higher interest rates.

 

Rates for Friday July 20, 2018:  The economic data suggests rates should be higher than they are, especially with the Fed selling off billions of dollars of mortgages and bonds every month. However investors, who ultimately control interest rates, do not look at just American economic data when making their decisions on what to buy and sell for long range profits, the also look at foreign economies, and as importantly domestic and international politics. It is the latter that has investors holding onto their fixed return investments (i.e. mortgages and bonds) as a hedge against some major event that could trigger a run on bonds and therefore lower rates. It is a strange set of market circumstances we have been experiencing. Thankfully we have benefited from flat rates for the past two months.

 

FIXED RATE MORTGAGES AT COST OF 1.25 POINTS LOCKED FOR 45 DAYS:

30 year conforming                                            4.375%            Flat

30 year high-balance conforming                      4.500%             Flat

 

Please note that these are base rates and adjustments may be added for condominiums, refinances, credit scores, loan to value, no impound account and period rate is locked. Rates are based on 20% down with 740 FICO score for purchase mortgages.

 

We have been down to one kid in the house since early in the month as the younger one is spending her annual month in Minnesota at camp, unfortunately for the older one she is basically termed out this year and must spend the summer at home. It has been nice to have her home with us since she leaves in 4-5 weeks to Boston for college and then we will be a one kid home for a few years before the younger ones decides to leave as well. We are in that period when our oldest is still our daughter and little girl but our relationship is slowly transitioning to daughter and adult. Certainly a unique summer for our family, and one that we will fondly remember for years to come. I hope you and your family are having a great, and unique, summer as well!

 

Have a great week,

 

Dennis

2-23-18: Do you think we are in a real estate price bubble that is coming to an end soon?

/in /by

 

 

Question of the week: Do you think we are in a real estate price bubble that is coming to an end soon?

 

Answer: This question, or some variation, has been asked by several different people in several different settings in the past few weeks. From clients, to real estate professionals, to friends, to attorneys and accounts asking in my office, on the phone, at dinner and in networking meetings, everyone wants to know, will housing markets drop precipitously in the near future?

 

My short answer: No. No, I do  not think we are in a real estate price bubble that is ending soon.

 

My long answer: why I feel this way.

 

One underlying facet to the question is everyone’s experience from the 2007-8 market crash, and the expectation that it will be duplicated because we have experienced a very large increase in real estate prices in the past 5-6 years, similar to the home price increases in the early 2000’s.

 

Comparing our current market to the market at the beginning of the century is not comparing similar actions and motivations of the buyers in the markets.

 

The pre-recession housing bubble was created by several factors. First, was the ease of financing. Following the lead of hard money, then soft money, lenders, Fannie and Freddie were purchasing mortgages from lenders that required no verification of income or assets and in many instances required no appraisal. Further, they were buying loans that were secured by homes with no equity—borrowers were also obtaining second mortgages, usually HELOCs, that took their total loan to value to 100% of the property value.  This easy money enabled many people to purchase homes, or refinance current homes and pull out equity, well above the prices and mortgages they would normally be able to qualify for, which often resulted in borrowers choosing adjustable rate mortgages for lower payments.

 

Second, were the motivations for much of the purchasing activity. Prices go up based on purchases not on refinances, the closed sales become comparable sales used for the next sales in a neighborhood. As prices rose many people felt that had to buy right away or miss out, not just on buying a piece of property but also on the money that could be made as the market went up. The shift in purpose that we saw was people buying investments they would live in instead of buying homes. They were motivated by trying to capitalize on a market, which resulting in highly leveraged and risky purchases, with the intention of selling or somehow cashing out—which was done with refinancing, pulling out equity and using this equity for consumption of goods and services.

 

Third, once the market softened homeowners who were highly leveraged, in mortgages they could not afford once they adjusted, and had little to no money in their home from their savings, found it easier to walk away or sell at a loss than homeowners who purchased in conventional markets.

 

Today, there is a healthy foundation to the housing market. Changes in underwriting policies have ensured that borrowers have the income to debt ratios and credit history to afford their mortgages. When purchasing they have down payment into the property, i.e. “skin in the game.” One more solid piece of this foundation, the overwhelming majority of homeowners who have mortgages that are long term low fixed rates.

In one market you had speculative purchasing, made with little to no down payments, financed with non-qualifying mortgages, many of which were non-fixed rate products. In the other market you have buyers purchasing homes for the long term, purchasing with down payments and financed with long term fixed rate mortgages with low interest rates.

 

If/when there is a turn in the housing market and we see prices flatten, or even dip, there will not be the resulting sharp drop in prices across regions because of the solid foundation that has been built with qualified, well-motivated homeowners. Bubbles pop and created market downfalls not because of a slight correction, but because that correction snowballs as owners panic and sell their product, thereby creating significant over-supply and exponential price declines. With families owning homes they can afford to retain and having purchased with their hard earned savings, a dip in the market will not create a panic-selling environment for any significant portion of the market to create a crash.

 

The most significant threats I see to housing in California, particularly along the coastal markets (which I define as any county that touches the Pacific) are cash for purchasing homes and interest rates. Both of these factors can limit buyers ability to qualify as home prices climb.

 

At some point prices will flatten, and possibly decline, I do not see this happening in the near future, but when this occurs it will not be long lived nor a deep decline in housing prices across several markets in the region, state or nation.

 

Have a question? Ask me!

 

Overreaction? On Wednesday the minutes were released from the January Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the group at the Federal Reserve that determines the federal funds rate. Almost immediately after the minutes were released, well immediately after investors had time to read them and then take action in the market, rates jumped as investors sold off bonds and mortgages. Why? Because the Fed has adjusted its economic outlook since its December meeting, forecasting stronger economic growth than previously thought and achieving the 2% inflation target sooner than previously thought. The minutes also showed that the FOMC members still feel that the economic outlook supports further “gradual increases” in the federal funds rate. Many investors trying to read the tea-leaves felt the Fed maintaining its stance was instead a signal that it will raise rates more than previously estimated (three times this year). This created a sell-off that became more pronounced as the day progressed spiking rates.

 

Rates for Friday February 23, 2018: After Wednesday’s big sell off investors returned to market with cooler heads on Thursday and Friday as investors bought back into the bond markets and over the two days scratched back almost all the losses. We see a slight bump in high-balance rates, but conforming holds on for the second straight Friday with no change. As we have been saying for over a month, rates are volatile so lock when you can.

 

FIXED RATE MORTGAGES AT COST OF 1.25 POINTS LOCKED FOR 45 DAYS:

30 year conforming                                            4.25%       Flat

30 year high-balance conforming                       4.50%      Up 0.125%

 

Please note that these are base rates and adjustments may be added for condominiums, refinances, credit scores, loan to value, no impound account and period rate is locked. Rates are based on 20% down with 740 FICO score for purchase mortgages.

Busy weekend for the Smith household as we host about 20 fifteen and sixteen year old’s for our daughter’s Sweet Sixteen party. Hopefully the weather cooperates and is not too chilly since we are setting up for an outdoor formal event. It is fun watching our little ones become young adults and see their friends grow and mature right alongside them. Sunday will be having family over for another celebration, and then perhaps a nap!

 

Have a great week,

 

Dennis

1-26-18: The tenant is still in the property, should we close

/in /by

 

 

Question of the week: The tenant is still in the property, should we close?

 

Answer:  With real estate values up many investors are selling properties they have been holding onto and renting for several years. As a result we have some issues pop-up on home sale transactions that do not present themselves when sellers are owner-occupants.

 

Over the weekend I got a call from clients who had just finished their final walk-through on a condo unit they were purchasing for mom and we were scheduled to fund and close on Monday.

 

The sellers had retained the condo as a rental years ago when they had purchased a new home. As part of the sales contract the seller agreed to have the property vacated by the tenant at least 10 days before closing. The buyers were calling because the tenant, and a fair amount of his possessions, was still in the property.

 

“What should we do?”

 

Don’t close.

 

I let them know that as soon as we concluded the call I would be notifying my office, the escrow officer and agents that because the tenant and his possessions were still in the property that we would not be funding on Monday unless the buyers contacted me to let me know the property was vacant.

 

Why?

 

Once you take ownership of the property the tenant becomes your tenant. And your problem. If the tenant decides to stay a while longer, or does not remove his possessions, you as a landlord are very restricted as to actions you may take due to tenant’s rights in the State of California. To remove the tenant you would have to go through the formal eviction process, which includes many filings and trips to court and if necessary engaging the county sheriff’s office to force eviction. Should the tenant fight the eviction and employ many of the legal delays available it can take up to a year to evict the tenant. I will not delve into the possible condition of the property once the tenant does vacate, voluntarily or involuntarily.

 

My advice to the client was to not proceed with funding the loan and closing the property until they made inspection to show that the tenant was no longer in the property or any of his possessions. Once that was confirmed they needed to change the locks as well as the code on the garage door opener to prevent his being able to re-enter the property.

 

On Monday morning the client called and said the tenant was out but some possessions were on the other side of a shared garage. Since the garage was shared with another unit, and that unit is vacant, my advice was to not close until those possessions were removed as it could still be construed as possession was with the tenant.

 

That evening the buyer called and let me know that the seller had removed the possessions, changed the locks and re-coded the garage door opener.

 

We funded the loan and closed on Tuesday on a vacant property that became full possession of the new owners.

 

Over the years I have been involved in a few nightmare scenarios involving our clients purchasing properties they intend to occupy with tenants still in residence because they closed with the tenants in possession. In every instance the buyers took the word of the seller, the tenant or the agent(s) that the tenant would be out of the property by closing. In one transaction the tenant left a few days after closing, but not before taking the appliances that were included in the sale. In another the tenant was still in the property one month after close and a pay-off was negotiated whereby the new owner gave the tenant a few thousand dollars to leave, giving him a cashier’s check in the street once the property was verified to be empty; the locksmith was there as well changing the locks while the transaction took place.

 

These are not the normal experiences of purchasing a home that has been used as a rental, however they do occur. If you are purchasing a home, or property, and you want it vacant at the time of closing, do not close until you verify it is vacant. No excuses, no promises, you want the property vacant when you take possession and once you do change all the locks and codes to enter the property.

 

If anyone wants an idea of the rights of tenants in California I suggest getting “Pacific Heights” from Netflix or Amazon. A bit extreme but…..

 

Have a question? Ask me!

 

Gross Domestic Product data for the 4th quarter of 2017 were released today and the report is positive once you dig into the data. Overall the economy grew at 2.6%, below the expectations of 3% or greater growth, and lower than the 3.2% growth in the 3rd quarter. Diving into the numbers GDP growth was restrained due to net exports which showed a $652 billion deficit (America imported $652 billion more in goods than it exported). This trade deficit pulled back what would have been a very strong GDP reading mostly due to the strongest quarter of consumer spending since 2015, up 3.8% from the prior quarter. With consumer spending being approximately 65-70% of our economy strong spending by consumers drives a strong economy. Another positive in the report was 2.4% increase in prices, also indicating economic strength. Just the headline number has a neutral impact on mortgage rates, digging into the numbers showing the strength of consumer activity is negative on mortgage rates and puts upward pressure on them in the short and long term.

 

Rates for Friday January 26, 2018: Rates bump up this week, and the conforming rate hits 4% for the first time since the last week of March 2017. With positive economic news we can expect more upward pressure on rates. If you are waiting for rates to dip back down you may have missed the opportunity. Lock your rate when you can!

 

FIXED RATE MORTGAGES AT COST OF 1.25 POINTS LOCKED FOR 45 DAYS:

30 year conforming                                            4.00%       Up 0.125

30 year high-balance conforming                       4.25%        Up 0.125%

 

Please note that these are base rates and adjustments may be added for condominiums, refinances, credit scores, loan to value, no impound account and period rate is locked. Rates are based on 20% down with 740 FICO score for purchase mortgages.

Throwback night for Leslie and I as we take the girls to the Honda Center for the Totally ‘80’s concert featuring many bands we listened to, well in the ‘80’s. Everyone is excited for the show and last night there was some impromptu warbling of some of the songs we may hear.

 

You know you are getting old when the songs you listened to after college, well after, are being played on the “Oldies” stations!

 

Have a great week,

 

Dennis